From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 29, 1990
788 S.W.2d 742 (Ark. 1990)

Opinion

No. RC 90-19

Opinion delivered May 29, 1990

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

Witt Law Firm, P.C., by: Ernie Witt, for appellant.

No response.


Appellant, William A. Graham, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Ernie Witt, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is a good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional conduct.


Summaries of

Graham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 29, 1990
788 S.W.2d 742 (Ark. 1990)
Case details for

Graham v. State

Case Details

Full title:William A. GRAHAM v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: May 29, 1990

Citations

788 S.W.2d 742 (Ark. 1990)
788 S.W.2d 742