From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 19, 2000
756 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D99-2324.

Decision filed April 19, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Dwight L. Geiger, Judge; L.T. No. 97-524 CF.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

GROSS, J., dissents in part, and concurs in part with opinion.


Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia. Appellant did not open the door to cross-examination about the potentially illicit use of the wax found in his pocket at the time of his arrest. See Bozeman v. State, 698 So.2d 629, 630-31(Fla. 4th DCA 1997). As it applies to the possession of cocaine count, I do not believe that the error is harmless. See Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1999). Even if that conviction were based not on the "dropsy" cocaine, but on the residue found on the pipe in appellant's pocket, the requirement that the defendant have knowledge of the presence of the cocaine precludes a finding of harmless error. I agree that any error was harmless as to the paraphernalia count.


Summaries of

Graham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 19, 2000
756 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Graham v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY RAY GRAHAM, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 19, 2000

Citations

756 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)