holding the trial judge's failure to give a prompt, clear ruling on the objection "was rendered harmless error by her later application of the Getz factors, after the evidence was admitted."
Summary of this case from Rose v. StateNo. 43, 2007.
August 21, 2007.
Appeal from the Superior 0605008032, 0603021096.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
holding the trial judge's failure to give a prompt, clear ruling on the objection "was rendered harmless error by her later application of the Getz factors, after the evidence was admitted."
Summary of this case from Rose v. StateFull title:Graham v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Aug 21, 2007
Id. at 119; cf. Graham v. State, 933 A.2d 1249, 2007 WL 2367763, at *2 (Del. Aug. 21, 2007) (TABLE) (holding…