From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. South Carolina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISCTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Oct 30, 2014
Civil Action No. 6:14-3518-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 6:14-3518-TMC

10-30-2014

Robert Graham, Jr. Plaintiff, v. State of South Carolina, Joshua L. Thomas, William H. Seals, Jr., Alan Wilson, Defendants.


OPINION & ORDER

Plaintiff, Robert Graham Jr., proceeding pro se, brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the defendants, State of South Carolina et al, alleging that they deprived him of his constitutional rights. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2), D.S.C., this case was referred to a magistrate judge for all pre-trial proceedings. This case is now before the court on the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending the court to summarily dismiss all defendants without prejudice and without service. (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report. (ECF No. 22). Accordingly, this matter is now ripe for review.

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In making that determination, the court is charged with conducting a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which either party specifically objects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Then, the court may accept, reject, or modify the Report or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge. See id.

Plaintiff's objections fail to address any specific, dispositive portion of the Report. The objections are non-specific, unrelated to the dispositive portions of the Report or merely restate Plaintiff's claims. The court has thoroughly reviewed the Report and Plaintiff's objections and finds no reason to deviate from the Report's recommended disposition.

Accordingly, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 20) and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is summarily DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge
October 30, 2014
Anderson, South Carolina

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Graham v. South Carolina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISCTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Oct 30, 2014
Civil Action No. 6:14-3518-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Graham v. South Carolina

Case Details

Full title:Robert Graham, Jr. Plaintiff, v. State of South Carolina, Joshua L…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISCTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 30, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 6:14-3518-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2014)