Graham v. Smith

1 Citing case

  1. U.S. Claims, Inc. v. Flomenhaft Cannata, LLC

    519 F. Supp. 2d 515 (E.D. Pa. 2006)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that law firm's unmatured contingency fee agreements were accounts rather than general intangibles

    However, as discussed previously, Plaintiff's proposed amendment with regard to its declaratory claim against Stillwater will not be granted because amendment would be futile. See, e.g., Graham v. Smith, 219 F.R.D. 206, 210 (D.Me. 2004) (granting leave to amend as to some claims but denying leave to amend for others based on futility). D. Rule 54(b) Certification