From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Purcell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 6, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0199 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0199 WBS DAD P.

June 6, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 27, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Graham v. Purcell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 6, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0199 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Graham v. Purcell

Case Details

Full title:JOHN GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. R.N. PURCELL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 6, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0199 WBS DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2007)