From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Michigan Department of Corrections

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Feb 21, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-277 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 21, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-277.

February 21, 2006


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION


Plaintiff, a prisoner incarcerated at the Hiawatha Correctional Facility (HTF), filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint as failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted on December 15, 2005. (Docket #3 and #4.) Plaintiff has filed a motion to serve the complaint, which the court construes as a motion filed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court finds that the motion is timely. See FED. R. CIV. P. 60. After careful consideration, the court will deny the motion.

Plaintiff's motion is not entirely coherent. Plaintiff reiterates the allegations and claims set forth in his complaint. However, Plaintiff fails to allege any new information indicating that Defendants' alleged misconduct violated his constitutional rights. Accordingly, the court will deny Plaintiff's motion as without merit. Therefore:

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (docket #7) be and hereby is DENIED.


Summaries of

Graham v. Michigan Department of Corrections

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Feb 21, 2006
Case No. 2:05-cv-277 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Graham v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM #249994, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-277 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 21, 2006)