Summary
In Graham v. Meyer, 99 N.Y. 611, it was held that a compromise made by a debtor with his creditor cannot be assailed on the ground that the debtor omitted to disclose his financial condition; and that where he is not questioned in regard thereto, and does nothing to mislead, he is not bound to make any such disclosure.
Summary of this case from Cleaveland v. RichardsonOpinion
Argued March 26, 1885
Decided April 14, 1885
Stephen P. Nash and William J. Gilson for appellant.
Bernard Roelker and Joseph H. Choate for respondent.
EARL, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.