From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Medstar Wash. Hosp. Ctr.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Sep 26, 2024
Civil Action 24-1308 (TJK) (D.D.C. Sep. 26, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 24-1308 (TJK)

09-26-2024

BETTY GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER Defendant.


MEMORANDUM

TIMOTHY J. KELLY, United States District Judge.

On May 31, 2024, Defendant moved to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or, alternatively, for summary judgment. The parties jointly moved for an extension of time to respond to the motion, which the Court granted. Plaintiff was then ordered to respond to Defendant's Motion by July 5, 2024. Plaintiff did not respond or request an additional extension of time to do so in the time provided by Local Rule 7(b). For that reason, on July 23, 2024, this Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause by August 16, 2024, why it should not treat Defendant's motion as conceded. Again, Plaintiff has not responded, so the Court will treat Defendant's motion to dismiss as conceded. See LCvR 7(b) (if a memorandum in opposition is not filed within the time directed by the Court, “the Court may treat the motion as conceded”). For all the above reasons, the Court will grant Defendant's motion to dismiss the case. A separate order will issue.


Summaries of

Graham v. Medstar Wash. Hosp. Ctr.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Sep 26, 2024
Civil Action 24-1308 (TJK) (D.D.C. Sep. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Graham v. Medstar Wash. Hosp. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:BETTY GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Sep 26, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 24-1308 (TJK) (D.D.C. Sep. 26, 2024)