From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Knickerbocker Insurance Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

November, 1934.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Judgments were in favor of the first and second mortgagees against the insurance company. The correct corporate name of the second mortgagee is "Rosendale Developing Company, Inc." The insurance policy carried the name "Rosendale Development Co." The slight discrepancy is without significance. The proof as to damages was proper under McAnarney v. Newark Fire Ins. Co. ( 247 N.Y. 176). There was no proof offered showing that the insured building was used as a hotel or store during the term of the policy.


Summaries of

Graham v. Knickerbocker Insurance Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Graham v. Knickerbocker Insurance Co. of New York

Case Details

Full title:ANNA GRAHAM, Respondent, v. KNICKERBOCKER INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)