From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Jayco, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 23, 2021
1:21-cv-00235-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00235-DAD-SKO

06-23-2021

PAMELA GRAHAM and DANIEL GRAHAM, Plaintiffs, v. JAYCO, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

(Doc. 17)

Sheila K. Oberto, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 22, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the entire action with prejudice. (Doc. 27.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Graham v. Jayco, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 23, 2021
1:21-cv-00235-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Graham v. Jayco, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA GRAHAM and DANIEL GRAHAM, Plaintiffs, v. JAYCO, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 23, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00235-DAD-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2021)