From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Franco

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 29, 2021
5:21-00054 SB (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)

Opinion

5:21-00054 SB (ADS)

06-29-2021

GEORGE WILLIAM GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. SHIRLEY FRANCO, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint and all related records and files herein, as well as the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge dated May 21, 2021 [Dkt. No. 13].

Finding no objections on file, it is hereby ordered:

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. No. 13] is accepted;

2. The First Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and

3. Judgment is to be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

Graham v. Franco

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 29, 2021
5:21-00054 SB (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Graham v. Franco

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE WILLIAM GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. SHIRLEY FRANCO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

5:21-00054 SB (ADS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2021)