From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 1937
251 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

June 25, 1937.


Order granting respondents' motion to stay all proceedings on the part of the plaintiffs for the collection of costs and allowances awarded, pending the determination of the accounting for which provision is made in the interlocutory judgment, at which time the question of setoff of such allowances against moneys found to be due to the defendants is to be determined, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The order properly maintains the status quo pending the determination of whether or not any moneys are found to be due to the defendants from the plaintiffs against which a setoff of the costs and allowances may be made. When that stage is reached the setoff must be subordinated to the attorney's lien if there be anything to which it may attach. ( Beecher v. Vogt Manufacturing Co., 227 N.Y. 468.) The costs and allowances belong to the plaintiffs. ( Matter of Howell, 215 N.Y. 466; 11 Carmody's New York Practice, § 310.) Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Graham v. Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 25, 1937
251 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Graham v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:JAMES S. GRAHAM, JENNIE S. GRAHAM, KATHERINE G. YOUNG, WILLIAM M. YOUNG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1937

Citations

251 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Krauss v. New Era Cab Corp.

The law is well settled that costs awarded in an action are the property of the party and not of his…