From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Durschlag

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00623-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00623-REB-KMT

02-25-2013

MARK GRAHAM, individually, and MARK GRAHAM COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. M.E. HANK DURSCHLAG, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#42] filed February 22, 2013. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that this action should be dismissed without prejudice.

"[#42 is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#42] filed February 22, 2013, is GRANTED; and

2. That this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Dated February 25, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Graham v. Durschlag

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00623-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Graham v. Durschlag

Case Details

Full title:MARK GRAHAM, individually, and MARK GRAHAM COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Colorado…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00623-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Feb. 25, 2013)