From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 30, 1992

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Motion for clarification denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff's motion to clarify the order is denied as unnecessary. Plaintiff is entitled by law to interest from the date of the verdict (see, CPLR 5002.)


Summaries of

Graham v. City of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1992
188 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Graham v. City of Rochester

Case Details

Full title:JERRY GRAHAM, Appellant-Respondent, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 1088 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)