From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Capital Area Transp. Auth.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 26, 2020
943 N.W.2d 120 (Mich. 2020)

Opinion

SC: 160735 COA: 345460

05-26-2020

Helen GRAHAM, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ruth McCoy, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAPITAL AREA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, a/k/a CATA, and Jose Pizana, Defendants-Appellees, and Burcham Hills Retirement Center II, Defendant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 19, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Graham v. Capital Area Transp. Auth.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 26, 2020
943 N.W.2d 120 (Mich. 2020)
Case details for

Graham v. Capital Area Transp. Auth.

Case Details

Full title:HELEN GRAHAM, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF RUTH McCOY…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 26, 2020

Citations

943 N.W.2d 120 (Mich. 2020)