From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 1, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3508 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3508.

March 1, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 28th day of February 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief and Statement of Issues In Support of Request For Review (Doc. No. 8), Defendant's Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 11), and after a review of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey (Doc. No. 13), it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. Defendant's unopposed Motion to Remand is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 13).

The Court will enter a separate Order consistent with the proposed Judgment Order that accompanies Defendant's Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 11).


Summaries of

Graham v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 1, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3508 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Graham v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DONALD GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 1, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3508 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2011)