From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graham v. Ankenbrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 31, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-92-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Oct. 31, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-92-BAJ-SCR

10-31-2011

ROBERT GRAHAM (#99451) v. DAVE ANKENBRAND, ET AL


RULING

The Court has carefully considered the motions, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated October 4, 2011 (doc. 29). Plaintiff has filed an objection (doc. 30) which the Court has considered.

The Court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein.

Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied, and defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice to any state law claim.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, October 31, 2011.

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Graham v. Ankenbrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 31, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-92-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Oct. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Graham v. Ankenbrand

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT GRAHAM (#99451) v. DAVE ANKENBRAND, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 31, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-92-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Oct. 31, 2011)