From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Grafmuller v. Wegner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 9, 2014
571 F. App'x 184 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-7785

05-09-2014

MICHAEL P. GRAFMULLER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOSEPH WEGNER, Director, Air Force Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.

Michael P. Grafmuller, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00050-RAJ-DEM) Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael P. Grafmuller, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael P. Grafmuller appeals from the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition challenging his military convictions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grafmuller v. Wegner, No. 2:13-cv-00050-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 5, 2013; entered Sept. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Grafmuller v. Wegner

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 9, 2014
571 F. App'x 184 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Grafmuller v. Wegner

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL P. GRAFMULLER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOSEPH WEGNER, Director…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 9, 2014

Citations

571 F. App'x 184 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Dorrbecker v. Mincey

Accordingly, the undersigned recommends these claims be dismissed.”), report and recommendation adopted, No.…

Anderson v. Bolster

This approach states that review by a federal district court of a military conviction is appropriate when the…