Summary
stating the Rule 11 "requires service of a motion" rather than "[warnings and informal applications"
Summary of this case from Albib v. Tiger Mach. Co.Opinion
Civil Action No. 08-1304 (FLW).
March 10, 2011
ORDER
THIS MATTER having been opened to the Court by Defendants PMC Global, Inc., PMC, Inc., PMC Europe Investments, S.L., Denis S. Commette, and Gama Machinery USA, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), on a motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 37; it appearing that Plaintiffs Graco, Inc. and Graco Minnesota, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs") opposed the motion; it appearing that the motion was referred to the Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation; it appearing that the Magistrate Judge rendered his decision on February 14, 2011; it further appearing that no parties have objected to the Report and Recommendation; it further appearing that the Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's thorough and thoughtful recommendations; accordingly,
IT IS on this 10th day of March, 2011,
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's February 14, 2011 Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED by this Court; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendants' motion for sanctions is hereby DENIED.