From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Graciano v. Botanika Beauty LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 17, 2021
21-CV-6934 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-6934 (JPO)

11-17-2021

SANDY GRACIANO, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. BOTANIKA BEAUTY LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge

Defendant was served on October 1, 2021. However, no appearance has been entered on Defendant's behalf, and no response to the complaint has been filed in the allotted time. Plaintiff has not moved for a default judgment.

Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court whether it intends to move for default judgment, or if it has received any communication from Defendant or its counsel regarding a response to the complaint.

If Plaintiff fails by December 3, 2021, to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Graciano v. Botanika Beauty LLC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 17, 2021
21-CV-6934 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Graciano v. Botanika Beauty LLC

Case Details

Full title:SANDY GRACIANO, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

21-CV-6934 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2021)