Grace v. EBay Inc.

3 Citing cases

  1. Silver v. Quora, Inc.

    CV 15-830 WPL/KK (D.N.M. Jun. 13, 2016)

    (Doc. 56 at 2.) Silver goes on to argue that the CDA only covers "interactive service providers," such as AOL or gmail. Silver further contends that Quora is a "publisher" or "distributor" of information and relies on Grace v. eBay Inc., 16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 192 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004), depublished by Grace v. eBay Inc., 99 P.3d 2 (Cal. 2004), and Cal. Rules of Court 8.1105(e)(1) and 8.1115(a), to argue that Quora is not entitled to CDA immunity in this case. Section 230 of the CDA defines an interactive computer service ("ICS") as "any information service, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides access to the Internet and such systems operated or services offered by libraries or educational institutions."

  2. Grace v. eBay Inc.

    19 Cal. Rptr. 3d 824 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 5 times
    Finding a child's statement to a police officer at a hospital was not formal and therefore nontestimonial under Crawford because the statements were made in a public, neutral location, there was no "structured questioning," and the statements occurred in the course of determining whether a crime had been committed and before any arrest had been made

    eBAY INCORPORATED.No. S127338.Supreme Court of CaliforniaOct. 13, 2004          Prior report: Cal.App., 16 Cal.Rptr.3d 192.          Respondent's petition for review GRANTED.

  3. Austin v. Crystaltech Web Hosting

    211 Ariz. 569 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 11 times

    As a result it may not be cited to this court and we will not consider it. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Adams, 187 Ariz. 585, 593, 931 P.2d 1095, 1103 (App. 1996). Austin also relies on Grace v. eBay, Inc., 16 Cal.Rptr.3d 192 (App. 2004), but it too has been depublished. ¶ 15 The Fourth Circuit's approach has been followed in two other circuits.