From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. The Right Spinal Clinic, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Apr 3, 2023
8:20-cv-0802-KKM-AAS (M.D. Fla. Apr. 3, 2023)

Opinion

8:20-cv-0802-KKM-AAS

04-03-2023

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE RIGHT SPINAL CLINIC, INC. et al, Defendants.


ORDER

Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff GEICO sues Defendants Right Spinal Clinic, Inc., its doctors, licensed massage therapists, owner, and manager (collectively Right Spinal) alleging fraudulent and unlawful billing in violation of Florida and federal law. Right Spinal moves to exclude fifteen pieces or categories of evidence from trial. Mot. Lim. (Doc. 321). GEICO opposes. Resp. (Doc. 325).

For the reasons explained at the pretrial conference, the following was orally ordered at that conference and memorialized here:

1. Right Spinal's motions in limine are resolved as follows:

a. Right Spinal's first motion is DENIED without prejudice.

b. Right Spinal's second motion is DENIED without prejudice.

c. Right Spinal's third motion is DENIED without prejudice.

d. Right Spinal's fourth motion is DENIED without prejudice.

e. Right Spinal's fifth motion is RESERVED for trial.

f Right Spinal's sixth motion is GRANTED in part.

i. GEICO must provide Defendants with a list, with dollar amounts, of each claim at issue in this case by April 7, 2023.

ii. GEICO should also provide this list to the Court by the same date via the chambers email address.

g. Right Spinal's seventh motion is DENIED.

h. Right Spinal's eighth motion is GRANTED to the extent that this evidence is not relevant at this juncture given that GEICO is not proceeding on its fourth theory of liability.

i. Right Spinal's ninth motion is GRANTED to the extent that this evidence is not relevant at this juncture given that GEICO is not proceeding on its fourth theory of liability.

j. Right Spinal's tenth motion is GRANTED to the extent that this evidence is not relevant at this juncture given that GEICO is not proceeding on its fourth theory of liability.

k. Right Spinal's eleventh motion is GRANTED to the extent that this evidence is not relevant at this juncture given that GEICO is not proceeding on its fourth theory of liability.

1. Right Spinal's twelfth motion is DENIED without prejudice.

m. Right Spinal's thirteenth motion is DENIED without prejudice.

n. Right Spinal's fifteenth motion is DENIED.

2. The parties may submit amended proposed jury instructions on the docket and send electronic copies to the chambers email address by April 7, 2023.

3. The parties may each submit an amended proposed verdict form on the docket and send electronic copies to the chambers email address by April 7, 2023.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. The Right Spinal Clinic, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Apr 3, 2023
8:20-cv-0802-KKM-AAS (M.D. Fla. Apr. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. v. The Right Spinal Clinic, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE RIGHT SPINAL…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Apr 3, 2023

Citations

8:20-cv-0802-KKM-AAS (M.D. Fla. Apr. 3, 2023)