From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gourmet Mgmt., Inc. v. Metro. Transp. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 12, 1990
163 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

July 12, 1990

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department.


After complying with the procedural requirements of the EDPL, the respondent determined that the leasehold interests held by the petitioners should be taken by eminent domain. Under the circumstances presented the respondent could lawfully condemn the leasehold estates even though the respondent, or its wholly owned subsidiary the Long Island Rail Road, was the lessor. (See, 51 N Y Jur 2d, Eminent Domain, § 39.) Further, the record discloses that there has been no condemnation in excess of that needed for public purposes, and that a taking of the entire leasehold interest of the petitioners is necessary in order to carry out plans for an extensive rehabilitation and improvement of Pennsylvania Station.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Milonas, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Gourmet Mgmt., Inc. v. Metro. Transp. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 12, 1990
163 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Gourmet Mgmt., Inc. v. Metro. Transp. Auth

Case Details

Full title:GOURMET MANAGEMENT, INC. et al., Petitioners, v. METROPOLITAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 184 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
558 N.Y.S.2d 44