Gould v. Walsh

Full title: CARL ERIC GOULD v. SUPERINTENDENT JEROME WALSH, et al

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 27, 2011

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-3370 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 10-3370.

July 27, 2011

ORDER

JUAN SANCHEZ, Judge

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of Petitioner Carl Eric Gould's pro se Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, to which no objections have been filed, ¹ it is ORDERED:

1 The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on June 24, 2011. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV(b), a party may object to a magistrate judge's report "within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof." As of today's date, no objections have been filed.

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and,

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED.