Opinion
2:21-cv-00045-CDS-NJK
08-31-2022
STEVEN ERIC GOULD, Plaintiff, v. TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendant.
ORDER
[DOCKET NO. 65]
NANCY J. KOPPE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pending before the Court is Defendants' motion to strike. Docket No. 65. No response was filed. See Docket. This matter is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1.
Defendants filed the instant motion on August 10, 2022. Docket No. 65. Plaintiff failed to respond to Defendants' motion and the time to do so has now passed. See Docket. “The failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion . . . constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.” Local Rule 7-2(d). Plaintiff has therefore consented to the granting of Defendants' motion, hi addition, the Court has reviewed Defendants' motion and finds it meritorious.
Accordingly, Defendants' motion to strike, Docket No. 65, is hereby GRANTED, and the Clerk's Office is instructed to strike the papers at Docket No. 61.
IT IS SO ORDERED.