From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gough v. Estes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 14, 1951
278 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

March 14, 1951.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ.


Appeal by defendant Sidney Estes from an order denying a motion to change the place of trial from the county of Essex to the county of Clinton on the ground of the convenience of witnesses. The actions are based upon negligence resulting from a two-car automobile collision which occurred in Plattsburgh, in the county of Clinton, N.Y. The actions have been consolidated. All of the parties reside in the county of Essex. It appears from the moving papers that the county seat of Essex County is approximately forty miles by improved road from the county seat of Clinton County. The moving papers set forth as the witnesses whose convenience will be served, two daughters of the defendant Estes and one Patricia Rooney of Plattsburgh, N.Y., who were passengers in the Estes car, and four policemen of Plattsburgh who are alleged to have investigated the accident but who did not witness it. The moving papers indicate the general subject of the testimony of these witnesses but specify no facts to which any of them will testify. The order appealed from is discretionary, and the lower court was entitled to consider the ends of justice as well as the convenience of witnesses. We find there was no abuse of discretion. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.


Summaries of

Gough v. Estes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 14, 1951
278 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Gough v. Estes

Case Details

Full title:PAUL L. GOUGH, by WINFIELD GOUGH, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Saphir v. Kruse

Prac. Act, § 187). For example, it is urged that they are defective in that there is no affidavit of merits (…