From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goss v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 19, 2021
No. 21-7071 (4th Cir. Oct. 19, 2021)

Opinion

21-7071

10-19-2021

DARRELL L. GOSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHARLES WILLIAMS, Respondent-Appellee.

Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: October 14, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:18-cv-02938-BHH)

Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se.

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Darrell L. Goss seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the court's prior order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). See generally United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 & n.7 (4th Cir. 2015). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S.Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Goss has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Goss v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 19, 2021
No. 21-7071 (4th Cir. Oct. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Goss v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL L. GOSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CHARLES WILLIAMS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 19, 2021

Citations

No. 21-7071 (4th Cir. Oct. 19, 2021)