Opinion
22-7387
04-25-2023
Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: April 20, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00900-BHH)
Darrell L. Goss, Appellant Pro Se.
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Darrell L. Goss appeals the district court's order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Goss' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action and the court's order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Goss v. Armstrong, No. 2:21-cv-00900-BHH (D.S.C. Aug. 8 &Nov. 18, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED