From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gosper v. Fancher

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 14, 1976
356 N.E.2d 479 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Argued September 8, 1976

Decided October 14, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, THOMAS J. RYAN, J.

Fenton F. Harrison for appellant. Robert Boasberg and John F. Collins for respondents.


MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed and judgment entered in accordance with the stipulation for the reasons stated in that court's memorandum, with the additional observation that the decision in Hines v Anchor Motor Frgt. ( 424 U.S. 554) reinforces the conclusion that damages for wrongful discharge could have been sought against the employer in this case.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

On plaintiff's appeal: Order affirmed, with costs, and judgment absolute granted in accordance with plaintiff's stipulation. Plaintiff's application to be relieved of his stipulation in the event of affirmance denied.

On defendant's cross appeal: Cross appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it does not lie.


Summaries of

Gosper v. Fancher

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 14, 1976
356 N.E.2d 479 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

Gosper v. Fancher

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE GOSPER, Appellant-Respondent, v. E.R. FANCHER et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 14, 1976

Citations

356 N.E.2d 479 (N.Y. 1976)
356 N.E.2d 479
387 N.Y.S.2d 1007

Citing Cases

Smith v. Sipe

The duty of a labor organization to fairly represent its members, which was created by Federal case law, is…

Santos v. Sec. Law Enforcement Employees

Special Term erred in refusing to dismiss the third cause of action in the amended complaint. Said cause of…