From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorton v. Todd

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 12, 2011
CIV. S-08-3069 LKK/GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2011)

Opinion


CHARLES R. GORTON, Plaintiff, v. K. TODD, et al., Defendants. No. CIV. S-08-3069 LKK/GGH P United States District Court, E.D. California. January 12, 2011

          LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

         On January 10, 2011, the court held a status conference in the above captioned case. Upon agreement of the parties, the court ORDERS as follows:

(1) Counsel for defendants Rad, Chin, Pappoe, Stevenson, and Don SHALL PROVIDE appointed, limited representation plaintiff's counsel all discovery no later than thirty (30) days from the issuance of this order.

(2) Plaintiff SHALL FILE a motion on whether the denial of plaintiff's request for an expert witness offends his constitutional rights no later than sixty (60) days thereafter.

(3) Defendants SHALL RESPOND to the motion no later than thirty (30) days thereafter.

(4) Plaintiff MAY FILE a reply twenty (20) days thereafter.

(5) The motion SHALL BE HEARD on June 20, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gorton v. Todd

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 12, 2011
CIV. S-08-3069 LKK/GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Gorton v. Todd

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES R. GORTON, Plaintiff, v. K. TODD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 12, 2011

Citations

CIV. S-08-3069 LKK/GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2011)