From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GORTON v. BICK

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 29, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0966 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0966 DAD P.

April 29, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. This matter is set for jury trial on May 23, 2011, before the undersigned. Defendant Miller has filed a motion in limine, a motion for summary adjudication, and a motion to dismiss, all of which are based on plaintiff's purported failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing this lawsuit. Defendant's motions have not been filed in compliance with the court's pretrial order and will be denied without prejudice to the raising of plaintiff's alleged failure to exhaust administrative remedies as an affirmative defense during the trial of this matter. See Order filed Apr. 12, 2011; see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 50 (authorizing the making of a motion for judgment as a matter of law in a jury trial before the case is submitted to the jury for decision).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motions (Doc. Nos. 119-122) are denied.

DATED: April 28, 2011.


Summaries of

GORTON v. BICK

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 29, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0966 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2011)
Case details for

GORTON v. BICK

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES ROBERT GORTON, Plaintiff, v. BICK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 29, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0966 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2011)