From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorter v. Industrial Accident Commission

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Oct 22, 1917
35 Cal.App. 88 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2226.

October 22, 1917.

APPLICATION for a Writ of Review originally made to the District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

H. Clyde Harms, and Randolph V. Whiting, for Petitioner.

Christopher M. Bradley, for Respondents.


Petition for writ of review.

It is contended by petitioner that the applicant in whose favor an award was made by the Industrial Accident Commission was not in his employ but was working independently, although under an arrangement with petitioner by which the latter furnished him with the necessary tools and appliances for performing his work and received forty per cent of the amounts earned by the applicant. The respondent, Industrial Accident Commission, concluded from the evidence on the whole that the relation of employer and employee existed, and thereupon made its award. We are satisfied that the evidence sustains this conclusion, and for that reason the writ is dismissed and the award affirmed.


Summaries of

Gorter v. Industrial Accident Commission

Court of Appeal of California, First District
Oct 22, 1917
35 Cal.App. 88 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)
Case details for

Gorter v. Industrial Accident Commission

Case Details

Full title:B. W. GORTER, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District

Date published: Oct 22, 1917

Citations

35 Cal.App. 88 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917)
169 P. 262