Opinion
TC-MD 111214N
08-24-2012
MONA D. GORSLINE, Plaintiff v. COLUMBIA COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant, and DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor.
DECISION OF DISMISSAL
ALLISON R. BOOMER MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
This matter is before the court on Defendant-Intervenor's motion to dismiss (motion) Plaintiff's Complaint “because the entire appeal has become moot.” (Inv's Ltr at 1, Aug 10, 2012.)
Plaintiff filed her Complaint on November 21, 2011, challenging Defendant-Intervenor's inactivation of Plaintiff's property tax deferral for property identified under the Senior and Disabled Property Tax Deferral Program for the 2011-12 tax year. In support of its motion, Defendant-Intervenor states:
“[A]t the July 17, 2012, case management conference, [P]laintiff explained that she had actually been a part owner and lived in the home for eleven years. The department has since confirmed these facts through county and DMV records. * * * [T]he department has determined that [P]laintiff does qualify for the deferral program for the 2011-12 property tax year. In accordance with this determination, the department has reactivated [P]laintiff's property tax deferral account and will pay the property tax to Columbia County on [P]laintiff's behalf for the 2011-12 tax year. Therefore, the case should be dismissed * * *.”(Inv's Ltr at 1, Aug 10, 2012.) As of the date of this decision, Plaintiff has not filed a response to Defendant-Intervenor's letter. After considering the matter, the court finds that Plaintiff's appeal should be dismissed as moot because Plaintiff has received the relief requested. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.