From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorsky v. Elmore

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 5, 2013
NUMBER 13-13-00455-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 5, 2013)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-13-00455-CV

09-05-2013

ALEX GORSKY, Appellant, v. SHEENA ELMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF A.E., A MINOR, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Nueces County, Texas.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Alex Gorsky, filed an interlocutory appeal from an order entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2012-CCV-61916-1. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the appeal is now moot. Appellant requests this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Gorsky v. Elmore

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 5, 2013
NUMBER 13-13-00455-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Gorsky v. Elmore

Case Details

Full title:ALEX GORSKY, Appellant, v. SHEENA ELMORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Sep 5, 2013

Citations

NUMBER 13-13-00455-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 5, 2013)