From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorski v. Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 15, 2016
SC: 153441 (Mich. Apr. 15, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 153441

04-15-2016

KAREN GORSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AT&T MICHIGAN, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Defendant.


Order

153441 & (15)(16) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 329039
Macomb CC: 201-003803-NF

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court. The motion for a stay of proceedings is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 15, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Gorski v. Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 15, 2016
SC: 153441 (Mich. Apr. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Gorski v. Michigan

Case Details

Full title:KAREN GORSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AT&T MICHIGAN, Defendant/Third-Party…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Apr 15, 2016

Citations

SC: 153441 (Mich. Apr. 15, 2016)