From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorrio v. Corr. Officer Francis

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 2022
2:19-cv-1297 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1297

11-16-2022

MICHAEL GORRIO, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRANCIS et al., Defendants


Patricia L. Dodge, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

J. Nicholas Ranjan, United States District Judge

This is a pro se prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules of Court applicable to Magistrate Judges.

Currently before the Court are Mr. Gorrio's objections [ECF 151] to various non-dispositive discovery-related orders issued by Judge Dodge. [ECF 143, ECF 144, ECF 145, ECF 146]. Upon review of the record, Mr. Gorrio's objections [151] request “sympathy” from the Court, but do not present any legal basis to sustain his objections. The Court finds that Judge Dodge's orders are reasonable - they are neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72.

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2022, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED.


Summaries of

Gorrio v. Corr. Officer Francis

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 16, 2022
2:19-cv-1297 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Gorrio v. Corr. Officer Francis

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL GORRIO, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRANCIS et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 16, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-1297 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 2022)