From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorrell v. Sneath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2012
Case No. 1:12-cv-00554 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-00554 AWI JLT Doc. 17

08-07-2012

WILSON GORRELL, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS C. SNEATH et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISREGARDING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

On July 19, 2012, Defendants waivers of personal service were filed. (Doc. 16) By waiving the requirement for personal service, Defendants were granted 60 days from the date of service, June 5, 2012, to respond to the complaint. (Doc. 16 at 1, 3, 5) Thus, Defendants' answer, filed on August 6, 2012, was timely, given that the 60th day fell on a weekend. (Doc. 18)

On August 6, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for judgment. (Doc. 17) Plaintiff seeks default judgment based upon Defendants' failure to answer within 21 days. However, of course, this deadline did not apply, given that Defendants were not personally served. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for judgment is DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Gorrell v. Sneath

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 7, 2012
Case No. 1:12-cv-00554 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Gorrell v. Sneath

Case Details

Full title:WILSON GORRELL, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS C. SNEATH et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-00554 AWI JLT (E.D. Cal. Aug. 7, 2012)