From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gormley v. Nike, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 11, 2011
Coordinated Case No. 11-cv-00893-SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Coordinated Case No. 11-cv-00893-SI Case No. 11-cv-01588-SI Case No. 11-cv-02451 SI

11-11-2011

DUSTIN GORMLEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, Defendant. ERIKA MCCARTNEY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NIKE, Inc., an Oregon corporation; and DOES 2 through 20, Defendants. KRISTEN L. HARTMAN, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NIKE USA, INC., an Oregon Corporation; NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC., an Oregon Corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

COOLEY LLP MICHELLE C. DOOLIN JENNIFER M. FRENCH BEATRIZ MEJIA MATTHEW M. BROWN Beatriz Mejia Attorneys for Defendants NIKE, INC., NIKE USA, INC., AND NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC. HOFFMAN & LAZEAR H. TIM HOFFMAN ARTHUR W. LAZEAR CHAD A. SAUNDERS Chad A. Saunders Attorneys for Plaintiff DUSTIN GORMLEY PACIFIC JUSTICE CENTER ROBERT B. HANCOCK MELVIN B. PEARLSTON Robert B. Hancock Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIKA MCCARTNEY FINEMAN & ASSOCIATES NEIL B. FINEMAN Neil B. Fineman Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIKA MCCARTNEY STONEBARGER LAW, APC GENE J. STONEBARGER RICHARD D. LAMBERT Gene J. Stonebarger Attorneys for Plaintiff KRISTEN L. HARTMAN


Gene J. Stonebarger, State Bar No. 209461

Richard D. Lambert, State Bar No. 251148

STONEBARGER LAW

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys for Plaintiff Kristen L. Hartman

Additional Attorneys Listed on Signature Page

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]]

ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION OF ACTION AND CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT

Hon. Susan Illston

Plaintiffs Dustin Gormley, Erika McCartney, and Kristen L. Hartman ("plaintiffs") and defendants Nike, Inc., Nike USA, Inc., and Nike Retail Services, Inc., by and through their respective counsel, jointly submit the following Stipulation regarding consolidation of the above-referenced actions for all purposes and the filing of plaintiffs' consolidated complaint on or before November 11, 2011.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, on July 20, 2011, Judge Illston issued an order coordinating the above-captioned related cases (Gormley v. Nike, Inc., Coordinated Case No. 11-cv-00893-SI, ECF No. 31); and

WHEREAS, the parties agree that the above-referenced actions should be consolidated for all purposes because it will promote the interests of judicial economy and efficiency; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that plaintiffs should file a consolidated complaint;

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that (1) the above-referenced actions shall be consolidated for all purposes, and (2) that plaintiffs shall file a consolidated complaint on or before November 11, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

COOLEY LLP

MICHELLE C. DOOLIN

JENNIFER M. FRENCH

BEATRIZ MEJIA

MATTHEW M. BROWN

Beatriz Mejia

Attorneys for Defendants

NIKE, INC., NIKE USA, INC., AND NIKE

RETAIL SERVICES, INC.

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

H. TIM HOFFMAN

ARTHUR W. LAZEAR

CHAD A. SAUNDERS

Chad A. Saunders

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DUSTIN GORMLEY

PACIFIC JUSTICE CENTER

ROBERT B. HANCOCK

MELVIN B. PEARLSTON

Robert B. Hancock

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ERIKA MCCARTNEY

FINEMAN & ASSOCIATES

NEIL B. FINEMAN

Neil B. Fineman

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ERIKA MCCARTNEY

STONEBARGER LAW, APC

GENE J. STONEBARGER

RICHARD D. LAMBERT

Gene J. Stonebarger

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KRISTEN L. HARTMAN

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, Subparagraph B, the undersigned attests that all parties have concurred in the filing of this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Consolidation of Action and Consolidated Complaint.

STONEBARGER LAW, APC

GENE J. STONEBARGER

RICHARD D. LAMBERT

Gene J. Stonebarger

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KRISTEN L. HARTMAN

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Honorable Susan Illston

United States District Judge

Related Case 11-1588 and 11-2451 shall be administratively closed.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on November 11, 2011, the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONSOLIDATION OF ACTION AND CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court to be served by operation of the Court's CM/ECF electronic filing system to all counsel of record.

Jamie Mendez


Summaries of

Gormley v. Nike, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 11, 2011
Coordinated Case No. 11-cv-00893-SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Gormley v. Nike, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN GORMLEY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 11, 2011

Citations

Coordinated Case No. 11-cv-00893-SI (N.D. Cal. Nov. 11, 2011)