From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 2, 1989

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.


Motion to dismiss denied, with leave to renew upon the argument of the appeal. Memorandum: An order resettling a prior order is appealable provided, however, that it "contain[s] a change that is a material one so as to be, in effect, a new determination, thereby creating a corresponding new right to appeal" (Matter of Kolasz v. Levitt, 63 A.D.2d 777, 779; see, Singer v. Board of Educ., 97 A.D.2d 507; May v. May, 66 A.D.2d 918).


Summaries of

Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 2, 1989
151 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD A. GORMEL, Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 1048 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Weksler v. Weksler

The June 2009 order contains a material change — the October 2008 order merely prohibited Schimek from…

Weksler v. Weksler

The June 2009 order contains a material change — the October 2008 order merely prohibited Schimek from…