Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.

Full title: JOHN C. GORMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TASSAJARA DEVELOPMENT…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Sixth District

Date published: Nov 4, 2009

No. H031196 (Cal. Ct. App. Nov. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Page 1019a

178 Cal.App.4th 1019a __ Cal.Rptr.3d__ JOHN C. GORMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TASSAJARA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. H031196 California Court of Appeal, Sixth District November 4, 2009

Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CV011261

THE COURT:

IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on October 6, 2009(178 Cal.App.4th 44; ___Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ), be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

1. On page 56, line 15 [178 Cal.App.4th 93, advance report, 2d par., line 30], after the first sentencing ending with "practitioner" and before the second sentence starting with "In Trope" insert the following sentence:

It is also settled that, if the Gorman firm had represented itself in litigation, it would not be able to recover for its own attorney fees.

There is no change in the judgment.

Appellant's petition for rehearing is denied.