From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorman v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 4, 1952
304 N.Y. 865 (N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

Argued October 24, 1952

Decided December 4, 1952

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, CORCORAN, J.

James H. Tully, Truman H. Luhrman and Edward J. McGowan for appellants.

Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel ( W. Bernard Richland and Pauline K. Berger of counsel), for respondents.

Miles F. McDonald, District Attorney of Kings County ( Aaron Nussbaum and Aaron E. Koota of counsel), amicus curiae, in support of respondents' position.

David Du Vivier and William Mason Smith, Jr., for the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, amicus curiae, in support of respondents' position.

Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney of New York County ( Richard G. Denzer and Charles W. Manning of counsel), amicus curiae, in support of respondents' position.

Samuel D. Smoleff, Laurence Arnold Tanzer and Bernard Hershkopf for The Citizens Union of the City of New York, amicus curiae, in support of respondents' position.



Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Gorman v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 4, 1952
304 N.Y. 865 (N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Gorman v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WALTER A. GORMAN et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 4, 1952

Citations

304 N.Y. 865 (N.Y. 1952)
109 N.E.2d 881

Citing Cases

Winston v. City of New York

As stated by then Justice Bergan in Gorman v. City of New York, 280 A.D. 39, 44-45, 110 N.Y.S.2d 711 (1st…

Tron v. Condello

Hence the attacks upon the statutory authorization on Contracts Clause grounds must fail.Cf. Gorman v. City…