From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorlamari v. Verrica Pharm.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 3, 2024
Civil Action 22-cv-2226 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 3, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-cv-2226

09-03-2024

KRANTHI GORLAMARI, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TED WHITE, P. TERENCE KOHLER JR. and A. BRIAN DAVIS, Defendants.


ORDER

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 42) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

a. The motion is DENIED as to claims against Verrica Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Ted White.
b. The motion is GRANTED as to claims against Terence Kohler, and these claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Kohler as a Defendant

3. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Defendants Verrica Pharma ceuticals and Ted White shall file an answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint.


Summaries of

Gorlamari v. Verrica Pharm.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 3, 2024
Civil Action 22-cv-2226 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Gorlamari v. Verrica Pharm.

Case Details

Full title:KRANTHI GORLAMARI, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 3, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-cv-2226 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 3, 2024)