From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorlamari v. Verrica Pharm.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 11, 2024
Civil Action 22-cv-2226 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-cv-2226

01-11-2024

KRANTHI GORLAMARI, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. VERRICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TED WHITE, P. TERENCE KOHLER JR. and A. BRIAN DAVIS, Defendants


ORDER

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J

AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and the response in opposition thereto, and Defendants' reply, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

a. The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims against Verrica Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Ted White regarding Defendants' May-June 2021 statements.
b. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects, and these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

2. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff may, if he can do so in good faith, file a second amended complaint in an attempt to cure the deficiencies outlined in the accompanying memorandum opinion.


Summaries of

Gorlamari v. Verrica Pharm.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 11, 2024
Civil Action 22-cv-2226 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Gorlamari v. Verrica Pharm.

Case Details

Full title:KRANTHI GORLAMARI, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 11, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-cv-2226 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 11, 2024)