From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gorham v. Richardson

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 9, 1973
483 F.2d 71 (5th Cir. 1973)

Opinion

No. 73-1859. Summary Calendar.

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

August 9, 1973.

Norman B. Gorham, pro se.

John W. Stokes, Jr., U.S. Atty., Anthony M. Arnold, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before WISDOM, AINSWORTH and CLARK, Circuit Judges.



In his petition for habeas corpus, Gorham alleges that the parole board deprived him of fundamental fairness and abused its discretion when it refused to grant him parole. As this Court, sitting en banc, has recently stated, "[i]n the absence of evidence of flagrant, unwarranted, or unauthorized action by the Board, it is not the function of the courts to review such proceedings." Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole (en banc), 5 Cir., 1973, 477 F.2d 278, 283. [Footnote omitted.] The record in the instant case reveals no evidence which would entitle Gorham to relief.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Gorham v. Richardson

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Aug 9, 1973
483 F.2d 71 (5th Cir. 1973)
Case details for

Gorham v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN B. GORHAM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. ELLIOT L. RICHARDSON, ATTORNEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Aug 9, 1973

Citations

483 F.2d 71 (5th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

Moody v. United States Board of Parole

Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole, 477 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1973). Also see Gorham v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 71 (5th…

Grasso v. Norton

file review of the (a)(2) prisoner's case is sufficient. Moody v. United States Board of Parole, 390 F.Supp.…