Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Goree v. State

748 So. 2d 829 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Goree v. State

5 Citing cases

  1. Hudson v. State

    977 So. 2d 344 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 15 times
    In Hudson v. State, 977 So. 2d 344 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007), a "trial judge did not state on the record that [the] testimony would be more probative than prejudicial, [but] both parties were given the opportunity to argue their position [during a hearing]."

    2005); Pleasant v. State, 701 So.2d 799 (Miss. 1997); Hoops v. State, 681 So.2d 521 (Miss. 1996); Goree v. State, 748 So.2d 829 (Miss.Ct.App. 1999). He argues that there was no proper foundation for this evidence, and that the trial court did not balance the probative value and prejudicial effect of this evidence pursuant to Mississippi Rule of Evidence 403.

  2. Strohm v. State

    2001 KA 1134 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 5 times

    He explains that the court's actions violated his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself and was unnecessary since Mrs. Miller had already identified him. Strohm also asserts that the forced display of his tattoos prejudiced the jury. He cites Randall v. State, 806 So.2d 185 (Miss. 2001) and Goree v. State, 748 So.2d 829 (Miss.Ct.App. 1999), as authorities for his position. Strohm actually cites Goree v. State, 794 So.2d 297 (Miss.Ct.App. 2001); however, it is obvious from the text of the cited authority that that is the wrong Goree. Strohm meant to cite, or should have cited, Goree v. State, 748 So.2d 829 (Miss.Ct.App. 1999).

  3. Dao v. State

    2006 KA 1170 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 11 times
    Distinguishing the facts of Burroughs because "[g]ang members are more likely to testify in favor of one another because the failure of a member to uphold the tenets of a gang could subject him to severe penalties"

    We therefore find Burroughs factually distinguishable from the case currently before us. ¶ 30. Finally, Dao cites Goree v. State, 748 So.2d 829 (Miss.Ct.App. 1999). In Goree, Tommy Goree was convicted of the aggravated assault of Dwight Home.

  4. Pugh v. State

    270 So. 3d 949 (Miss. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 1 times
    Holding that "statements made after the completed act pertaining to a coverup of that act are admissible under Rule 801(d)(E)"

    We find the Snapchat video was "in some way related or linked to the crime charged." SeeGoree v. State , 748 So.2d 829, 838 (¶ 19) (Miss. Ct. App. 1999) (When determining whether the probative value of evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice to the defendant, "[t]he key issue remains whether [the evidence] was in some way related or linked to the crime charged."). As a result, its admission did not violate Rule 403.

  5. Johnson v. State

    101 So. 3d 717 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012)   Cited 5 times

    Hudson, 977 So.2d at 349 (¶ 24). ¶ 12. Johnson cites Goree v. State, 748 So.2d 829 (Miss.Ct.App.1999), for the proposition that the proper foundation was not laid for this evidence, and as such, it should not have been admitted. In Goree, the circuit court had allowed testimony that the defendant was affiliated with a gang.