From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 8, 1993
616 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 91-2809.

April 8, 1993.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County, Royce Agner, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Marilyn McFadden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant challenges his convictions for possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia, arguing that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain the convictions. We reject appellant's assertion and affirm the convictions without further elaboration.

Appellant also challenges an order revoking his probation, arguing that several of the violations cited in the written order were not proved at the revocation hearing. The state correctly concedes the need for a remand so that the trial court can conform its written revocation order to its oral pronouncements. On remand, the trial court should strike from its order the references to a violation of condition (10), and paragraphs B, C, F, G, H, I and J.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 8, 1993
616 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Gore v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD CRAIG GORE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 8, 1993

Citations

616 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Tessier v. State

As amended, the order of revocation of probation is affirmed. See Gore v. State, 616 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA…

Pearce v. State

The state concedes, and we agree, that the written order of revocation must be corrected to strike all…