From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gore v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 16, 2021
2:21-CV-1189-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-1189-KJM-DMC-P

11-16-2021

SAMUEL LEE GORE, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge under the Eastern District of California local rules.

On September 22, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. No. objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 22, 2021, are adopted in full;
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Gore v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 16, 2021
2:21-CV-1189-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Gore v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LEE GORE, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-1189-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2021)