From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gore v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:21-CV-1189-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-1189-DMC-P

07-14-2021

SAMUEL LEE GORE, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Defendant.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Under Eastern District of California Local Rules, this case was not assigned to a District Judge when the case was filed. The parties have not consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction and the Court now finds that assignment of a District Judge is necessary to properly address the case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge and to update the docket to reflect the new case number.


Summaries of

Gore v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:21-CV-1189-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Gore v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LEE GORE, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-1189-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)