From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gore v. Dallas Cty.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 16, 2008
No. 05-08-00822-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-08-00822-CV

Opinion Filed December 16, 2008.

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. TX-05-31387.

Before Justices MOSELEY, FITZGERALD, and LANG-MIERS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Terence M. Gore appealed the trial court's January 7, 2008 judgment. Because it appeared the notice of appeal was untimely, we directed the parties to file letter briefs addressing our jurisdiction over the appeal. Appellant responded that we have jurisdiction over the appeal because he amended his notice of appeal to reflect this is a restricted appeal. On November 24, 2008, appellee Dallas County responded that on August 28, 2008, pursuant to section 33.56 of the Texas Property Code, the trial court vacated its judgment and set the case for trial on February 19, 2009. Therefore, there is no longer a judgment in place over which the Court has jurisdiction.

Absent a final judgment, there is nothing before the Court over which we have jurisdiction. See generally Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1997, no writ). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Gore v. Dallas Cty.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Dec 16, 2008
No. 05-08-00822-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Gore v. Dallas Cty.

Case Details

Full title:TERENCE M. GORE, Appellant v. DALLAS COUNTY, ET. AL., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Dec 16, 2008

Citations

No. 05-08-00822-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2008)